|
Metabase Meet & Greet Meet the WMSE team behind Metabase and other editors and friends of Metabase! Everyone is welcome, regardless if you are an active editor or simply interested in the platform. Ask questions, brainstorm and write queries, or simply chat about the future of Metabase. The first Metabase Meet & Greet will be in November - help us pick the time. |
Talk:Modelling/Events and activities: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:The issue of updating the data model for events is something we will consider. Happy editing! -- [[User:Andreas Kettelhoit (WMSE)|Andreas Kettelhoit (WMSE)]] ([[User talk:Andreas Kettelhoit (WMSE)|talk]]) 08:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC) | :The issue of updating the data model for events is something we will consider. Happy editing! -- [[User:Andreas Kettelhoit (WMSE)|Andreas Kettelhoit (WMSE)]] ([[User talk:Andreas Kettelhoit (WMSE)|talk]]) 08:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC) | ||
:: Hi [[User:Andreas Kettelhoit (WMSE)|Andreas]] thanks for the quick reply and the feedback! I have changed {{Q|90}} to {{Q|22134}}. Also thank you for considering to update the data model for events. If it helps I can elaborate a bit more on the background of my request (there might be another/better solution):I am hoping/planning to start using metabase for metrics registration for our chapter (instead of our excel file :), and one of our metrics is affected content pages (not solely for content donations). I can imagine this is the case for more affiliates intending to start using metabase. [[User:MichellevL (WMNL)|MichellevL (WMNL)]] ([[User talk:MichellevL (WMNL)|talk]]) 09:06, 9 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:06, 9 September 2024
Adding number of affected content pages to data model guidelines?
Since there are many events (edit-a-thons, workshops, contests) that also have affected content pages, would it make sense to add that property to the data model for events? I added it to one of the events by WMNL (see Q24386), is that the right way to go about it? MichellevL (WMNL) (talk) 08:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hello Michelle. Glad to see you've started editing!!
- How to model the number of affected content pages is described on Modelling/Content uploads and also on ../Resource types. As for Springclean your data workshop (Q24386) you done it almost right. We use linked data (Q22134) as qualifier instead of Structured Data on Commons (Q90).
- The issue of updating the data model for events is something we will consider. Happy editing! -- Andreas Kettelhoit (WMSE) (talk) 08:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Andreas thanks for the quick reply and the feedback! I have changed Structured Data on Commons (Q90) to linked data (Q22134). Also thank you for considering to update the data model for events. If it helps I can elaborate a bit more on the background of my request (there might be another/better solution):I am hoping/planning to start using metabase for metrics registration for our chapter (instead of our excel file :), and one of our metrics is affected content pages (not solely for content donations). I can imagine this is the case for more affiliates intending to start using metabase. MichellevL (WMNL) (talk) 09:06, 9 September 2024 (UTC)